Actually, recent research shows that true high performance teams ask literally 10 times more questions to and of each other than low performance teams. But the trick is in the ratios, not the quantity. I would argue that "questions" stand for inquiry and "answers" stand for advocacy. In a high performance team, the ratio between inquiry and advocacy is 1.1 to 1.0, so almost a perfect equilibrium. In a low performance team it's 0.1 to 1.0. Go figure...
Previously answered on www.quora.com , my favorite pass time to flex my brain and engage with smart, opinionated people...
Train the top 100/400 to shut up and listen. Listen = silent, only with letters rearranged. Train them to facilitate a dialogue. Train them to tell their own story authentically. Then get them to engage in a dialogue with 25 people at a time, sitting in a circle, until they have talked with every employee in the company. The format: "Here's our best thinking. What do you make of it?" Open dialogue thereafter, 1.5 hour per session. Get a graphical artist to record the session. Put those flips out in the hallways everywhere for a year and invite people to continue doodling and talking. Strategy delivered.
Previously answered on www.quora.com , my favorite pass time to flex my brain and engage with smart, opinionated people...
Some of the answers I post on Quora, for example. Because people who visit this blog may not be on Quora (yet).
So I'll be sharing some of my oldies here in the next few weeks, if they really have merit, that is...
Kevin Small sent me the book with the aformentioned title. It's a worthwhile read by Terri Sjodin, who is a specialist in all things elevator pitch.
I usually get slightly allergic when people talk about this topic, because it annoys me that everyting seems to have to fit in under 2 minutes these days.
I genuinely liked the book. It pays good attention to helping you sort out what the purpose of your message is, how to craft your elevator speech accordingly and pays a lot of attention to the importance of narrative. The book is very consistent with the methods suggested in it and for a change, I loved the review of concepts discussed at the end of each chapter. It's also warm-hearted and self-deprecating, which endeared me to the author and her message. The whole book conveys a sense of not haviing to be perfect, but your best. Loads of specific tips and practical hooks to get cracking.
Go buy, whether you are seasoned or rookie in this domain. You're bound to get something good out of it!
http://www.amazon.com/Small-Message-Big-Impact-Elevator/dp/1608321304
Here's a brief post on @IanSanders website with a video where I explain why if you really want to change something, you shouldn't sit in a soulless conference room but should take your team on a real, physical journey with a sound process attached to it: http://bit.ly/hy1Mhk
Check out his site here
A while ago, I came across this funny company called zappos.com. It's interesting, because they don't even formally trade in Holland. Yet I found the tweets that its CEO, Tony Hsieh posted so funny, weird and interesting that I researched it. So I asked for their culture book. And sure enough, this wasn't a fad, within 5 working days - Vegas to Holland, that's 5400 miles for you- the UPS guy was on my doorstep. So there was the first WOW experience.
Then I learned that Tony was about to publish a book. And that I could get a free advance copy if committed to review it. Again within a heartbeat, the UPS guy rings the bell at the office door. I get not one but two copies, with all sorts of smart thinking about how to entice me to spread the word. WOW experience #2.
I am an advisor that helps organizations transform their way of working together and build healthy cultures. So I am running a program for client where I think a dialogue with Tony would help them a lot. I send him a message. I am contacted within 24 hours with precisely the right information by his European representative. WOW experience #3.
Why am I sharing all of this with you? Because its easy to SAY that you deliver happiness. But at Zappos they DO it every day. The aforementioned three instances show that pretty conclusively for me.
So I can write a long, semi-scientific review of Tony's book. Or I can tell you that you should buy it. Because his story is worth reading. It's a story of how he sold his first company for $ 265 million. And that running that company made him wretchedly unhappy. And how he invested in Zappos, became its CEO and nearly "blew" all the money he made in life on it. Why? Because he passionately believed (and believes) that you could run a company in a different and healthy way. Where people actually are...happy. And what's more, make their stakeholders happy as its core offering. For the skeptics: it grew from 0 to $ 1 billion in revenues in under 10 years. It was sold to Amazon in the first ever stock only deal they did for $ 1.2 billion at the time of closing. And they promised they wouldn't change the culture.
While the book is not a how-to guide and at some points lacks structure for the more traditionally oriented, it's a story worth reading and if you digest it properly, there's a ton you can learn from these people.
Somebody asked: How do organisations change to deeply implement more sustainability
and
climate awareness in their actions? And how can this be supported?
Here's my answer:
Sustainability & climate change are fragments or representations of a fragmented world that is not whole. Focusing an organisation on these domains will not do anything (expletive deleted) for bringing about more sustainability or eventually put a stop to climate change. This is because the purpose of organisations is not to be sustainable, but to sustain themselves, if need be at the expense of other fragments.